Difference between revisions of "2021 AIME II Problems/Problem 15"
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→See also: also -> Also Case consistency) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 2 (Four Variables)) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
\end{align*}</cmath></li><p> | \end{align*}</cmath></li><p> | ||
<li><math>\boldsymbol{g(n)}</math><p> | <li><math>\boldsymbol{g(n)}</math><p> | ||
− | If <math>n</math> and <math>(k+1)^2</math> have the same parity, then | + | If <math>n</math> and <math>(k+1)^2</math> have the same parity, then we get <math>g(n)=f(n)</math> from <math>g\left((k+1)^2\right)=k+1</math> by a similar process. This contradicts the precondition <math>\frac{f(n)}{g(n)} = \frac{4}{7}.</math> Therefore, <math>n</math> and <math>(k+1)^2</math> must have different parities, from which <math>n</math> and <math>(k+2)^2</math> must have the same parity. <p> |
It follows that <math>k^2<n<(k+2)^2,</math> or <cmath>n=(k+2)^2-2q\hspace{38.25mm}(3)</cmath> for some integer <math>q</math> such that <math>0<q<2k+2.</math> By recursion, we get | It follows that <math>k^2<n<(k+2)^2,</math> or <cmath>n=(k+2)^2-2q\hspace{38.25mm}(3)</cmath> for some integer <math>q</math> such that <math>0<q<2k+2.</math> By recursion, we get | ||
<cmath>\begin{align*} | <cmath>\begin{align*} |
Revision as of 16:56, 26 July 2021
Contents
Problem
Let and be functions satisfying and for positive integers . Find the least positive integer such that .
Solution 1
Consider what happens when we try to calculate where n is not a square. If for (positive) integer k, recursively calculating the value of the function gives us . Note that this formula also returns the correct value when , but not when . Thus for .
If , returns the same value as . This is because the recursion once again stops at . We seek a case in which , so obviously this is not what we want. We want to have a different parity, or have the same parity. When this is the case, instead returns .
Write , which simplifies to . Notice that we want the expression to be divisible by 3; as a result, . We also want n to be strictly greater than , so . The LHS expression is always even (why?), so to ensure that k and n share the same parity, k should be even. Then the least k that satisfies these requirements is , giving .
Indeed - if we check our answer, it works. Therefore, the answer is .
-Ross Gao
Solution 2 (Four Variables)
We consider and separately:
We restrict in which for some positive integer or for some integer such that By recursion, we get
If and have the same parity, then we get from by a similar process. This contradicts the precondition Therefore, and must have different parities, from which and must have the same parity.
It follows that or for some integer such that By recursion, we get
- Answer
By and we have From and equating the expressions for gives Solving for produces We substitute into then simplify, cross-multiply, and rearrange: Since we know that must be divisible by and must be divisible by
Recall that the restrictions on and are and respectively. Substituting into either inequality gives Combining all these results produces To minimize in either or we minimize so we minimize and in From and we construct the following table: Finally, we have Substituting this result into either or generates
- Remark
We can verify that
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 3
Since isn't a perfect square, let with . If is odd, then . If is even, then from which Since is even, is even. Since , the smallest is which produces the smallest : ~Afo
Solution 4 (Quadratics With Two Variables)
To begin, note that if is a perfect square, , so , so we must look at values of that are not perfect squares (what a surprise). First, let the distance between and the first perfect square greater than or equal to it be , making the values of and integers. Using this notation, we see than , giving us a formula for the numerator of our ratio. However, since the function of does not add one to the previous inputs in the function until a perfect square is achieved, but adds values of two, we can not achieve the value of in unless is an even number. However, this is impossible, since if was an even number, , giving a ratio of one. Thus, must be an odd number.
Thus, since must be an odd number, regardless of whether is even or odd, to get an integral value in , we must get to the next perfect square after . To make matters easier, let . Thus, in , we want to achieve .
Expanding and substituting in the fact that yields:
Thus, we must add the quantity to to achieve a integral value in the function . Thus.
However, note that the quantity within the square root is just , and so:
Thus,
Since we want this quantity to equal , we can set the above equation equal to this number and collect all the variables to one side to achieve
Substituting back in that , and then separating variables and squaring yields that
Now, if we treat as a constant, we can use the quadratic formula in respect to to get an equation for in terms of (without all the squares). Doing so yields
Now, since and are integers, we want the quantity within the square root to be a perfect square. Note that . Thus, assume that the quantity within the root is equal to the perfect square, . Thus, after using a difference of squares, we have Since we want to be an integer, we know that the should be divisible by five, so, let's assume that we should have divisible by five. If so, the quantity must be divisible by five, meaning that leaves a remainder of one when divided by 5 (if the reader knows LaTeX well enough to write this as a modulo argument, please go ahead and do so!).
Thus, we see that to achieve integers and that could potentially satisfy the problem statement, we must try the values of congruent to one modulo five. However, if we recall a statement made earlier in the problem, we see that we can skip all even values of produced by this modulo argument.
Also, note that won't work, as they are too small, and will give an erroneous value for . After trying , we see that will give a value of , which yields , which, if plugged in to for our equations of and , will yield the desired ratio, and we're done.
Side Note: If any part of this solution is not rigorous, or too vague, please label it in the margin with "needs proof". If you can prove it, please add a lemma to the solution doing so :)
-mathislife52
Video Solution
See Also
2021 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 14 |
Followed by Last Question | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.