|
Research:
Current Research
The Role of Intentional Self-Regulation in
Achievement in Engineering
This collaborative engineering education research grant was
awarded to the Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development
at Tufts University and Northwestern University. The question being
asked is: Are intentional Self-regulation skills (often termed soft
skills) of particular importance to engineers as they develop their
knowledge base and launch their careers?
The proposed research is a first-ever assessment of the relations
among
- Engineering achievement among male and female students
beginning through advanced undergraduate engineering students
(as indexed by GPA for engineering courses);
- The status of their hard (intellectual) skills (indexed by
SAT scores and GPAs for science and math courses); and
- The soft (life, motivational, or pragmatic) skills that
have been identified in developmental research to be linked
significantly to school achievement and life success.
The study will use a cross-sectional design to assess a random
sample of about 200 sophomore through senior engineering students on
the above-noted sets of measures. In addition, the same assessments
will be made with a matched comparison sample of about 200 male and
female, sophomore through senior, arts and science students, with
non-math/science majors (i.e., with majors in the social sciences or
in the humanities).
The contribution of the proposed research lies in the attention paid
to the role that intentional self-regulation skills may play in
successful engineering education. The results of this research will
provide to engineering educators, to policy makers, and to business
and industry leaders heretofore-unavailable scientific information
about how to assess and integrate key features of the development of
the whole person his or her cognitive, motivational, emotional,
and behavioral characteristics in promoting engineering
achievement across college years.
The broader impacts resulting from the proposed research include
providing a model for future engineering education and education
research and a baseline against which future educational innovations
may be measured. It will also help faculty better balance the hard
(science and math) and soft skill sets in the undergraduate
curriculum.
|