The Global Development And Environment Institute

     

 




Search GDAE

Subscribe for
E-mail Updates

Recent Publications

GDAE in the News

Upcoming Events

Publicaciones en Espanol

Jobs and Resources

 

 

Excerpt from "Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything
and the Value of Nothing"

by Frank Ackerman & Lisa Heinzerling

Article re-printed from The San Diego Union-Tribune December 21, 2003, Sunday

Excerpt from "Priceless: On Knowing the Price of Everything and the
Value of Nothing"

By Frank Ackerman & Lisa Heinzerling
The New Press, 277 pages, Hardcover $25.95, Paperback $16.95

Right up to the day they died, Russian immigrants Mariaya Diment and Liya Murkes loved to take long walks together along the oceanfront near the senior residence where they lived in Santa Monica. One summer day in the year 2000, Cheryl Chadwick, reportedly talking on a cell phone while driving her Mercedes-Benz, plowed into Diment and Murkes while they were
strolling, killing them both.

What happened to Mariya Diment and Liya Murkes is not unusual, and almost certainly will become less so; as many as 1,000 people a year now die in car accidents caused by what some are calling "phoneslaughter." Researchers have found that people who are talking on cellular phones while driving are four times more likely to get into car accidents than people who are not -- about the same as the increased risk from driving after several drinks (around the legal threshold for drunk driving in most states). Ten years ago, only 10 million people worldwide had ever even used a cell phone; by now, cell phone users number a billion and
counting. The vast majority of Americans with cell phones talk on them while driving.

Most states, and many cities and towns, are deciding whether to do something to prevent these accidents. Some places have banned cell phone use while driving. Others have used laws already on the books -- even homicide laws -- to try to get at the problem.

Some of the country's most influential economists, however -- based on research conducted with the help of generous funding from wireless providers -- have concluded these restrictions are a bad idea. Why? Because the people who are talking while driving are willing to pay a
lot to talk on the phone -- more than many people who face deadly risks are willing to pay to avoid the risk of being killed. What these researchers have done is compare the price of phone calls made while driving with the "price" of deadly risks. Since risk is not, like cell phones and calling plans, directly bought and sold in the marketplace, economists have tried to find places where it is sold indirectly. They have focused mainly on risky workplaces, where extra wages are, in theory, required to convince workers to accept increased risks of death. In comparing levels of wages and risk, economists have estimated that groups of workers doing dangerous jobs are paid, on average, a total of about $5- to $6-million more, per work-related death. By comparing the price of cell phone use with the "price" of risky work, economists have concluded that banning cell phone use in cars makes no economic sense.

 

Top of Page

Global Development And Environment Institute
Tufts University
Medford , MA 02155 USA
tel. 617-627-3530 - fax. 617-627-2409 
email: gdae@tufts.edu

 

Copyright © 2002-2007 Tufts University